FLGR vs IVV
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLGR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $37M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.43% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 68 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +5.37% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.26% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.12% | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.05% | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -48.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | May 15, 2000 |
FLGR vs IVV Performance
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FLGR returned +6.26% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, FLGR is up 5.37% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, FLGR compounded at +19.12% per year against +21.49% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.05% and +13.43% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +5.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.9% for FLGR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLGR charges 0.09% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLGR currently yields 3.43% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FLGR and IVV share 1 holdings out of 566 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLGR | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| APP | 4.74% | 0.18% | 4.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLGR or IVV?
FLGR has an expense ratio of 0.09% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLGR or IVV?
Over the past year FLGR returned +6.26% vs +23.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLGR annualized +5.41% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLGR or IVV?
FLGR has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FLGR -48.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FLGR and IVV?
FLGR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLGR and IVV?
FLGR and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 566 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLGR or IVV?
FLGR yields 3.43% while IVV yields 1.09%, so FLGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.