FLGR vs VTI
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLGR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $37M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.43% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 68 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +5.12% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.81% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.01% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.88% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -48.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
FLGR vs VTI Performance
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLGR returned +6.81% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, FLGR is up 5.12% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, FLGR compounded at +19.01% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.88% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs +5.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.9% for FLGR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLGR charges 0.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLGR currently yields 3.43% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FLGR and VTI share 2 holdings out of 2843 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLGR or VTI?
FLGR has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLGR or VTI?
Over the past year FLGR returned +6.81% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLGR annualized +5.38% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLGR or VTI?
FLGR has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FLGR -48.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FLGR and VTI?
FLGR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLGR and VTI?
FLGR and VTI share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2843 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLGR or VTI?
FLGR yields 3.43% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FLGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.