FLGR vs SCHD
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, FLGR or SCHD?
Each has led over a different period.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. FLGR led over 3Y, SCHD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLGR | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $39M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.20% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 68 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +0.64% | +23.46%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.60% | +27.20%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.70%Best | +15.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.01% | +10.16%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 16.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -48.9% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,700 | $16,223Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 62.0% | 41.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2017 to Sep 18, 2026 (8.9 years).
FLGR vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.9 years both funds cover.
FLGR vs SCHD Performance
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year FLGR returned +3.60% while SCHD returned +27.20%. Year to date, FLGR is up 0.64% versus a gain of 23.46% for SCHD.
Over three years, FLGR compounded at +18.70% per year against +15.41% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +8.01% and +10.16% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +10.99% annualized vs +4.80%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 16.1% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.9% for FLGR and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLGR charges 0.09% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $6 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLGR currently yields 3.20% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
1.0% of FLGR's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 4.8% of SCHD's money is in holdings FLGR also owns.
SCHD and FLGR share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in FLGR and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 68 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 98 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for FLGR (95.2% of the fund), and 1 for FLGR that do not appear in SCHD (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLGR | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.01% | 4.77% | 3.76% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FLGR and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLGR or SCHD?
FLGR has an expense ratio of 0.09% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLGR or SCHD?
Over the past year FLGR returned +3.60% vs +27.20% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLGR annualized +4.80% vs +10.99% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLGR or SCHD?
FLGR has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 16.1% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: FLGR -48.9% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both FLGR and SCHD?
FLGR and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FLGR and SCHD?
4.8% of SCHD's money is in holdings FLGR also owns. 4.8% of SCHD's is in holdings FLGR also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in FLGR and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLGR or SCHD?
FLGR yields 3.20% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so FLGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than FLGR?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. FLGR led over 3Y, SCHD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.