FLGR vs VOO
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLGR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $37M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.43% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 68 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +5.37% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.26% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.12% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.05% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -48.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FLGR vs VOO Performance
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLGR returned +6.26% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, FLGR is up 5.37% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, FLGR compounded at +19.12% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.05% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +5.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.9% for FLGR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLGR charges 0.09% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLGR currently yields 3.43% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FLGR and VOO share 1 holdings out of 566 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLGR | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| APP | 4.74% | 0.21% | 4.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLGR or VOO?
FLGR has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLGR or VOO?
Over the past year FLGR returned +6.26% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLGR annualized +5.41% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLGR or VOO?
FLGR has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FLGR -48.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FLGR and VOO?
FLGR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLGR and VOO?
FLGR and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 566 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLGR or VOO?
FLGR yields 3.43% while VOO yields 1.09%, so FLGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.