FLGR vs VYM
FLGR vs VYM
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLGR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $37M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.43% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 68 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +5.37% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.26% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.12% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.05% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -48.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FLGR vs VYM Performance
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLGR returned +6.26% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, FLGR is up 5.37% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, FLGR compounded at +19.12% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +8.05% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +5.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.9% for FLGR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLGR charges 0.09% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $4 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLGR currently yields 3.43% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FLGR and VYM share 0 holdings out of 620 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLGR or VYM?
FLGR has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLGR or VYM?
Over the past year FLGR returned +6.26% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLGR annualized +5.41% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLGR or VYM?
FLGR has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FLGR -48.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FLGR and VYM?
FLGR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLGR and VYM?
FLGR and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 620 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLGR or VYM?
FLGR yields 3.43% while VYM yields 2.86%, so FLGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.