FLGR vs VYM
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, FLGR or VYM?
Each has led over a different period.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FLGR led over 3Y, VYM over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLGR | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $39M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.20% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 68 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +0.64% | +11.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.60% | +15.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.70%Best | +17.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.01% | +12.30%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -48.9% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,700 | $17,861Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 62.0% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2017 to Sep 18, 2026 (8.9 years).
FLGR vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.9 years both funds cover.
FLGR vs VYM Performance
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLGR returned +3.60% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, FLGR is up 0.64% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Over three years, FLGR compounded at +18.70% per year against +17.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +8.01% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +9.63% annualized vs +4.80%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 15.1% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.9% for FLGR and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLGR charges 0.09% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $4 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLGR currently yields 3.20% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
1.0% of FLGR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 1.3% of VYM's money is in holdings FLGR also owns.
VYM and FLGR share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in FLGR and 557 in VYM, against full books of 68 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 527 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for FLGR (95.8% of the fund), and 1 for FLGR that do not appear in VYM (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLGR | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.01% | 1.31% | 0.30% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FLGR and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLGR or VYM?
FLGR has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLGR or VYM?
Over the past year FLGR returned +3.60% vs +15.34% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLGR annualized +4.80% vs +9.63% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLGR or VYM?
FLGR has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 15.1% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FLGR -48.9% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both FLGR and VYM?
FLGR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FLGR and VYM?
1.3% of VYM's money is in holdings FLGR also owns. 1.3% of VYM's is in holdings FLGR also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in FLGR and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLGR or VYM?
FLGR yields 3.20% while VYM yields 2.22%, so FLGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than FLGR?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FLGR led over 3Y, VYM over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.