FLQS vs GSC
Franklin US Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF vs Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity ETF
Which is better, FLQS or GSC?
GSC has been ahead.
FLQS has a lower expense ratio. GSC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLQS | GSC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $48M | $296M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 0.22% |
| Holdings | 562 | 200 |
| YTD Return | +11.62% | +12.03%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.72% | +17.33%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.49% | +15.57%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.07% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3%Best | 18.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.1%Best | -27.0% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $14,747 | $15,716Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Goldman Sachs Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2017 | Oct 3, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 5, 2023 to Nov 6, 2026 (3.1 years).
FLQS vs GSC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
FLQS vs GSC Performance
Franklin US Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQS) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity ETF (GSC) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management. Over the past year FLQS returned +14.72% while GSC returned +17.33%. Year to date, FLQS is up 11.62% versus a gain of 12.03% for GSC.
Over three years, FLQS compounded at +13.49% per year against +15.57% for GSC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 17.3% for FLQS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.1% for FLQS and -27.0% for GSC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLQS charges 0.35% per year while GSC charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $75 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLQS currently yields 1.49% against 0.22% for GSC.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 37 holdings in FLQS and 98 in GSC, totalling 56.3% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in FLQS and 98 in GSC, against full books of 562 and 200.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FLQS and GSC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLQS or GSC?
FLQS has an expense ratio of 0.35% while GSC charges 0.75%. FLQS is the cheaper option, by $40 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLQS or GSC?
Over the past year FLQS returned +14.72% vs +17.33% for GSC, so GSC leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLQS or GSC?
GSC has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 17.3% for FLQS. Worst drawdown: FLQS -23.1% vs GSC -27.0%.
Should I hold both FLQS and GSC?
FLQS and GSC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLQS or GSC?
FLQS yields 1.49% while GSC yields 0.22%, so FLQS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GSC better than FLQS?
FLQS has a lower expense ratio. GSC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.