FLQS vs SCDV
Franklin US Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF vs Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF
Which is better, FLQS or SCDV?
FLQS has been ahead.
FLQS has a lower expense ratio. FLQS led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLQS | SCDV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35%Best | 0.70% |
| AUM | $48M | $146M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 562 | 82 |
| YTD Return | +11.62%Best | +6.58% |
| 1Y Return | +14.72%Best | +8.21% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.49% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.07% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.0%Best | 14.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.9%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $10,926Best | $10,414 |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Bahl & Gaynor |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2017 | Dec 11, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 12, 2024 to Nov 6, 2026 (1.9 years).
FLQS vs SCDV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
FLQS vs SCDV Performance
Franklin US Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQS) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) is an ETF from Bahl & Gaynor. Over the past year FLQS returned +14.72% while SCDV returned +8.21%. Year to date, FLQS is up 11.62% versus a gain of 6.58% for SCDV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 14.0% for FLQS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.9% for FLQS and -22.8% for SCDV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLQS charges 0.35% per year while SCDV charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $70 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLQS currently yields 1.49% against 0.44% for SCDV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 37 holdings in FLQS and 36 in SCDV, totalling 56.3% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in FLQS and 36 in SCDV, against full books of 562 and 82.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FLQS and SCDV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLQS or SCDV?
FLQS has an expense ratio of 0.35% while SCDV charges 0.70%. FLQS is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLQS or SCDV?
Over the past year FLQS returned +14.72% vs +8.21% for SCDV, so FLQS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FLQS annualized +4.77% vs +2.16% for SCDV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLQS or SCDV?
SCDV has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 14.0% for FLQS. Worst drawdown: FLQS -20.9% vs SCDV -22.8%.
Should I hold both FLQS and SCDV?
FLQS and SCDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLQS or SCDV?
FLQS yields 1.49% while SCDV yields 0.44%, so FLQS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCDV better than FLQS?
FLQS has a lower expense ratio. FLQS led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.