FLTW vs SCHD
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. FLTW delivered stronger 1-year returns. FLTW offers more diversification with 139 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLTW | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $3.5B | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.76% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 139 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +66.34% | +26.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +89.80% | +30.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +44.29% | +16.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +21.86% | +9.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.0% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.0% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Oct 20, 2011 |
FLTW vs SCHD Performance
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year FLTW returned +89.80% while SCHD returned +30.90%. Year to date, FLTW is up 66.34% versus a gain of 26.54% for SCHD.
Over three years, FLTW compounded at +44.29% per year against +16.29% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +21.86% and +9.65% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLTW has the edge at +18.90% annualized vs +11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLTW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.0% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.0% for FLTW and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLTW charges 0.19% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $6 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLTW currently yields 1.76% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
FLTW and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 233 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLTW or SCHD?
FLTW has an expense ratio of 0.19% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $13 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLTW or SCHD?
Over the past year FLTW returned +89.80% vs +30.90% for SCHD, so FLTW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLTW annualized +18.90% vs +11.51% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLTW or SCHD?
FLTW has been the more volatile fund at 23.0% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: FLTW -38.0% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both FLTW and SCHD?
FLTW and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLTW and SCHD?
FLTW and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 233 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLTW or SCHD?
FLTW yields 1.76% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.