FLTW vs QQQ
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, FLTW or QQQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. FLTW led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, QQQ over the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLTW | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $4.6B | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.58% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 137 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +76.14%Best | +21.44% |
| 1Y Return | +89.14%Best | +23.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +47.49%Best | +27.86% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +23.34%Best | +16.25% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.9% | 19.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -38.0% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $28,544Best | $21,231 |
| Top 10 Weight | 51.6% | 47.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2017 to Oct 1, 2026 (8.9 years).
FLTW vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.9 years both funds cover.
FLTW vs QQQ Performance
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FLTW returned +89.14% while QQQ returned +23.58%. Year to date, FLTW is up 76.14% versus a gain of 21.44% for QQQ.
Over three years, FLTW compounded at +47.49% per year against +27.86% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +23.34% and +16.25% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +19.79% annualized vs +19.37%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLTW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.9% compared with 19.9% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.0% for FLTW and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLTW charges 0.19% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $18 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLTW currently yields 1.58% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 133 holdings in FLTW and 102 in QQQ, totalling 99.8% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 133 positions we hold weights for in FLTW and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 137 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 96 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for FLTW (97.8% of the fund), and 1 for FLTW that do not appear in QQQ (0.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FLTW and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLTW or QQQ?
FLTW has an expense ratio of 0.19% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLTW or QQQ?
Over the past year FLTW returned +89.14% vs +23.58% for QQQ, so FLTW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLTW annualized +19.37% vs +19.79% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLTW or QQQ?
FLTW has been the more volatile fund at 22.9% annualized versus 19.9% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: FLTW -38.0% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both FLTW and QQQ?
FLTW and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLTW or QQQ?
FLTW yields 1.58% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so FLTW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than FLTW?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. FLTW led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, QQQ over the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.