FLTW vs QQQ
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. FLTW delivered stronger 1-year returns. FLTW offers more diversification with 139 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLTW | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $3.5B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.76% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 139 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +60.57% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +89.21% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +42.38% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +21.67% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FLTW vs QQQ Performance
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FLTW returned +89.21% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, FLTW is up 60.57% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, FLTW compounded at +42.38% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +21.67% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLTW has the edge at +18.39% annualized vs +13.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 22.9% for FLTW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.0% for FLTW and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLTW charges 0.19% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $18 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLTW currently yields 1.76% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FLTW and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 235 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLTW or QQQ?
FLTW has an expense ratio of 0.19% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLTW or QQQ?
Over the past year FLTW returned +89.21% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so FLTW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLTW annualized +18.39% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLTW or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 22.9% for FLTW. Worst drawdown: FLTW -38.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FLTW and QQQ?
FLTW and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLTW and QQQ?
FLTW and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 235 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLTW or QQQ?
FLTW yields 1.76% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FLTW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.