FLTW vs VXUS
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, FLTW or VXUS?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. FLTW led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLTW | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $3.7B | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.76% | 2.59% |
| Holdings | 139 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +74.09%Best | +16.15% |
| 1Y Return | +103.15%Best | +27.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +45.66%Best | +20.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +21.88%Best | +9.09% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.9% | 15.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -38.0%Best | -39.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $26,894Best | $15,450 |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2017 to Sep 4, 2026 (8.8 years).
FLTW vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.8 years both funds cover.
FLTW vs VXUS Performance
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLTW returned +103.15% while VXUS returned +27.58%. Year to date, FLTW is up 74.09% versus a gain of 16.15% for VXUS.
Over three years, FLTW compounded at +45.66% per year against +20.48% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +21.88% and +9.09% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLTW has the edge at +19.38% annualized vs +7.27%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLTW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.9% compared with 15.7% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.0% for FLTW and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLTW charges 0.19% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $5 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLTW currently yields 1.76% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 62.6% of FLTW's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
106 positions in common, counted across the 133 positions we hold weights for in FLTW and 8,092 in VXUS, against full books of 139 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLTW | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2454:TWMediatek, Inc. | 8.90% | 0.44% | 8.46% |
| 2308:TWDelta Electronics | 4.89% | 0.27% | 4.62% |
| 2317:TWHon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd Ord Twd10 | 4.78% | 0.22% | 4.56% |
| 2383:TWElite Material Co Ltd | 2.34% | 0.11% | 2.23% |
| 3037:TWUnimicron Technology Corp | 1.90% | 0.10% | 1.80% |
| 2345:TWAccton Technology Corp | 1.83% | 0.09% | 1.74% |
| 2891:TWCtbc Financial Holding Co Ltd | 1.79% | 0.09% | 1.70% |
| 2881:TWFubon Financial Holding Co Ltd | 1.67% | 0.08% | 1.59% |
| 2882:TWCathay Financial Holdings Co. Ltd. | 1.48% | 0.07% | 1.41% |
| 2327:TWYageo Corp | 1.39% | 0.13% | 1.26% |
62.6% of FLTW is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLTW or VXUS?
FLTW has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLTW or VXUS?
Over the past year FLTW returned +103.15% vs +27.58% for VXUS, so FLTW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLTW annualized +19.38% vs +7.27% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLTW or VXUS?
FLTW has been the more volatile fund at 22.9% annualized versus 15.7% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FLTW -38.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FLTW and VXUS?
FLTW and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FLTW and VXUS?
At least 62.6% of FLTW's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 106 positions in common, counted across the 133 positions we hold weights for in FLTW and 8,092 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLTW or VXUS?
FLTW yields 1.76% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than FLTW?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. FLTW led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.