FLTW vs VOO
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FLTW delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLTW | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.5B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.76% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 139 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +62.10% | +13.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +86.76% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +42.88% | +22.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +22.02% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FLTW vs VOO Performance
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLTW returned +86.76% while VOO returned +21.62%. Year to date, FLTW is up 62.10% versus a gain of 13.20% for VOO.
Over three years, FLTW compounded at +42.88% per year against +22.16% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +22.02% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLTW has the edge at +18.52% annualized vs +13.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLTW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.0% for FLTW and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLTW charges 0.19% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLTW currently yields 1.76% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FLTW and VOO share 0 holdings out of 638 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLTW or VOO?
FLTW has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLTW or VOO?
Over the past year FLTW returned +86.76% vs +21.62% for VOO, so FLTW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLTW annualized +18.52% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLTW or VOO?
FLTW has been the more volatile fund at 22.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FLTW -38.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FLTW and VOO?
FLTW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLTW and VOO?
FLTW and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 638 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLTW or VOO?
FLTW yields 1.76% while VOO yields 1.08%, so FLTW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.