FLTW vs VTI
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FLTW or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FLTW led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLTW | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4.6B | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.58% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 137 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +76.14%Best | +12.51% |
| 1Y Return | +89.14%Best | +15.23% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +47.49%Best | +22.50% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +23.34%Best | +12.31% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.9% | 16.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -38.0% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $28,544Best | $17,869 |
| Top 10 Weight | 51.6% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2017 to Oct 1, 2026 (8.9 years).
FLTW vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.9 years both funds cover.
FLTW vs VTI Performance
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLTW returned +89.14% while VTI returned +15.23%. Year to date, FLTW is up 76.14% versus a gain of 12.51% for VTI.
Over three years, FLTW compounded at +47.49% per year against +22.50% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +23.34% and +12.31% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLTW has the edge at +19.37% annualized vs +13.35%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLTW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.9% compared with 16.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.0% for FLTW and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLTW charges 0.19% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLTW currently yields 1.58% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 133 holdings in FLTW and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 99.8% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, FLTW as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 133 positions we hold weights for in FLTW and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 137 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FLTW (97.5% of the fund), and 1 for FLTW that do not appear in VTI (0.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FLTW and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLTW or VTI?
FLTW has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLTW or VTI?
Over the past year FLTW returned +89.14% vs +15.23% for VTI, so FLTW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLTW annualized +19.37% vs +13.35% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLTW or VTI?
FLTW has been the more volatile fund at 22.9% annualized versus 16.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FLTW -38.0% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both FLTW and VTI?
FLTW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLTW or VTI?
FLTW yields 1.58% while VTI yields 1.03%, so FLTW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FLTW?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FLTW led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.