FMAG vs HUMM
Fidelity Magellan ETF vs 800VDC AI Datacenter Ecosystem ETF
Which is better, FMAG or HUMM?
HUMM costs less.
HUMM has a lower expense ratio. FMAG is less concentrated, with 44.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FMAG | HUMM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $243M | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 52 | 20 |
| YTD Return | +0.58%Best | -12.56% |
| 1Y Return | -1.29% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.55% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.50% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.0%Best | 57.0% |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 2, 2021 | Sep 16, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FMAG vs HUMM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FMAG vs HUMM Performance
Fidelity Magellan ETF (FMAG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and 800VDC AI Datacenter Ecosystem ETF (HUMM) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, FMAG is up 0.58% versus a loss of 12.56% for HUMM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FMAG charges 0.57% per year while HUMM charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $49 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMAG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for HUMM.
Holdings Overlap
1.3% of FMAG's money is in holdings HUMM also owns. 4.4% of HUMM's money is in holdings FMAG also owns.
HUMM and FMAG share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FMAG and 20 in HUMM, against full books of 52 and 20.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 12 positions for HUMM that do not appear in our book for FMAG (64.1% of the fund), and 48 for FMAG that do not appear in HUMM (96.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FMAG | Weight in HUMM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETNEaton Corp Plc | 1.34% | 4.38% | 3.04% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FMAG and HUMM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FMAG or HUMM?
FMAG has an expense ratio of 0.57% while HUMM charges 0.49%. HUMM is the cheaper option, by $8 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FMAG and HUMM?
4.4% of HUMM's money is in holdings FMAG also owns. 4.4% of HUMM's is in holdings FMAG also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FMAG and 20 in HUMM.
Which pays a higher dividend, FMAG or HUMM?
FMAG yields 0.00% while HUMM yields 0.00%, so FMAG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HUMM better than FMAG?
HUMM has a lower expense ratio. FMAG is less concentrated, with 44.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.