FMAG vs VTI
Fidelity Magellan ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FMAG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $246M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +5.04% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.70% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.46% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.04% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 2, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
FMAG vs VTI Performance
Fidelity Magellan ETF (FMAG) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FMAG returned +3.70% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, FMAG is up 5.04% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, FMAG compounded at +18.46% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.04% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, FMAG has the edge at +11.15% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FMAG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.9% for FMAG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FMAG charges 0.57% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $3 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMAG currently yields 0.08% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FMAG and VTI share 47 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 32.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FMAG or VTI?
FMAG has an expense ratio of 0.57% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FMAG or VTI?
Over the past year FMAG returned +3.70% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FMAG annualized +11.15% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FMAG or VTI?
FMAG has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FMAG -32.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FMAG and VTI?
FMAG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FMAG and VTI?
FMAG and VTI share 47 common holdings with a 32.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FMAG or VTI?
FMAG yields 0.08% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.