FMED vs VOO
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FMED delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FMED | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $46M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 74 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.02% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.62% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.16% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FMED vs VOO Performance
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FMED returned +25.62% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, FMED is up 12.02% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, FMED compounded at +8.16% per year against +21.80% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +5.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FMED has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.8% for FMED and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FMED charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMED currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FMED and VOO share 13 holdings out of 563 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FMED or VOO?
FMED has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FMED or VOO?
Over the past year FMED returned +25.62% vs +22.02% for VOO, so FMED leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FMED annualized +5.99% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FMED or VOO?
FMED has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FMED -21.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FMED and VOO?
FMED and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FMED and VOO?
FMED and VOO share 13 common holdings with a 2.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 563 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FMED or VOO?
FMED yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.