FMTM vs IVV
MarketDesk Focused US Momentum ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FMTM delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FMTM | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $243M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.22% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +18.46% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +45.72% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | MarketDesk Indices | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 20, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
FMTM vs IVV Performance
MarketDesk Focused US Momentum ETF (FMTM) is a ETF from MarketDesk Indices and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FMTM returned +45.72% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, FMTM is up 18.46% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FMTM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.4% for FMTM and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FMTM charges 0.45% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMTM currently yields 0.22% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FMTM and IVV share 13 holdings out of 523 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FMTM or IVV?
FMTM has an expense ratio of 0.45% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FMTM or IVV?
Over the past year FMTM returned +45.72% vs +22.61% for IVV, so FMTM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FMTM annualized +37.54% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FMTM or IVV?
FMTM has been the more volatile fund at 20.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FMTM -15.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FMTM and IVV?
FMTM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FMTM and IVV?
FMTM and IVV share 13 common holdings with a 2.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 523 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FMTM or IVV?
FMTM yields 0.22% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.