FMTM vs IVV
MarketDesk Focused US Momentum ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FMTM or IVV?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FMTM led over 1Y and the full window. FMTM is less concentrated, with 37.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FMTM | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $277M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.25% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 52 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +17.67%Best | +13.39% |
| 1Y Return | +40.39%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.3% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.4% | -13.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $15,680Best | $13,989 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.5%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | MarketDesk Indices | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 20, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 20, 2025 to Sep 4, 2026 (1.5 years).
FMTM vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
FMTM vs IVV Performance
MarketDesk Focused US Momentum ETF (FMTM) is an ETF from MarketDesk Indices and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FMTM returned +40.39% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, FMTM is up 17.67% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FMTM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.3% compared with 11.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.4% for FMTM and -13.7% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FMTM charges 0.45% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMTM currently yields 0.25% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
57.5% of FMTM's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 3.3% of IVV's money is in holdings FMTM also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in FMTM and 504 in IVV, against full books of 52 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 476 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FMTM (95.9% of the fund), and 14 for FMTM that do not appear in IVV (42.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FMTM | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LRCXLam Resh Corp | 3.89% | 0.58% | 3.31% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd. | 4.03% | 0.28% | 3.75% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc - Common | 3.68% | 0.44% | 3.24% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc - A | 3.75% | 0.32% | 3.43% |
| NTAPNetapp | 3.79% | 0.06% | 3.73% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc. | 3.65% | 0.20% | 3.45% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp Company Guar 11/28 3 | 3.51% | 0.27% | 3.24% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 3.21% | 0.26% | 2.95% |
| STTStt Un Equity | 3.30% | 0.08% | 3.22% |
| FTNTFortinet | 3.19% | 0.15% | 3.04% |
57.5% of FMTM is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FMTM or IVV?
FMTM has an expense ratio of 0.45% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FMTM or IVV?
Over the past year FMTM returned +40.39% vs +20.08% for IVV, so FMTM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FMTM annualized +34.97% vs +25.08% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FMTM or IVV?
FMTM has been the more volatile fund at 20.3% annualized versus 11.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FMTM -15.4% vs IVV -13.7%.
Should I hold both FMTM and IVV?
FMTM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FMTM and IVV?
57.5% of FMTM's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 3.3% of IVV's is in holdings FMTM also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in FMTM and 504 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FMTM or IVV?
FMTM yields 0.25% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FMTM?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FMTM led over 1Y and the full window. FMTM is less concentrated, with 37.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.