FMTM vs VTI
MarketDesk Focused US Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FMTM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FMTM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $243M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.22% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.46% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +45.72% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | MarketDesk Indices | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 20, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
FMTM vs VTI Performance
MarketDesk Focused US Momentum ETF (FMTM) is a ETF from MarketDesk Indices and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FMTM returned +45.72% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, FMTM is up 18.46% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FMTM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.4% for FMTM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FMTM charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMTM currently yields 0.22% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FMTM and VTI share 26 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FMTM or VTI?
FMTM has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FMTM or VTI?
Over the past year FMTM returned +45.72% vs +23.31% for VTI, so FMTM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FMTM annualized +37.54% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FMTM or VTI?
FMTM has been the more volatile fund at 20.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FMTM -15.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FMTM and VTI?
FMTM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FMTM and VTI?
FMTM and VTI share 26 common holdings with a 2.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FMTM or VTI?
FMTM yields 0.22% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.