FNDA vs VAMO
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company ETF vs Cambria Value and Momentum Hedged Equity ETF
Which is better, FNDA or VAMO?
Each has led over a different period.
FNDA has a lower expense ratio. FNDA led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VAMO over 5Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNDA | VAMO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $8.8B | $85M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.21% | 0.65% |
| Holdings | 1,828 | 208 |
| YTD Return | +15.90%Best | +3.38% |
| 1Y Return | +19.62%Best | +7.94% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.42%Best | +12.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.44% | +6.68%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.4% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -45.9% | -41.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,662 | $13,817Best |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Cambria Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 15, 2013 | Sep 8, 2015 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2015 to Nov 11, 2026 (11.2 years).
FNDA vs VAMO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.2 years both funds cover.
FNDA vs VAMO Performance
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company ETF (FNDA) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Cambria Value and Momentum Hedged Equity ETF (VAMO) is an ETF from Cambria Investment Management. Over the past year FNDA returned +19.62% while VAMO returned +7.94%. Year to date, FNDA is up 15.90% versus a gain of 3.38% for VAMO.
Over three years, FNDA compounded at +17.42% per year against +12.37% for VAMO; over five years the annualized figures are +6.44% and +6.68% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, FNDA has the edge at +9.68% annualized vs +4.22%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNDA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.4% compared with 13.0% for VAMO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.9% for FNDA and -41.8% for VAMO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNDA charges 0.25% per year while VAMO charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $65 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNDA currently yields 1.21% against 0.65% for VAMO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 4.5% of FNDA's money is in holdings VAMO also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VAMO, our book for it covers 94.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
FNDA and VAMO share little of their money.
37 positions in common, counted across the 910 positions we hold weights for in FNDA and 102 in VAMO, against full books of 1,828 and 208.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FNDA | Weight in VAMO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| EXELExelixis Inc | 0.31% | 0.93% | 0.62% |
| PARRPar Pacific Holdings Inc | 0.36% | 0.86% | 0.50% |
| TEXTerex Corp | 0.26% | 0.86% | 0.60% |
| ZDZiff Davis Inc | 0.19% | 0.93% | 0.74% |
| TALOTalos Energy Inc Common Stock Usd | 0.16% | 0.95% | 0.79% |
| AGLAgilon Health Inc 0.00000000 | 0.16% | 0.93% | 0.77% |
| PRPermian Resource | 0.07% | 1.00% | 0.93% |
| ENSEnersys | 0.25% | 0.80% | 0.55% |
| UMBFUmb Financial Corp. | 0.15% | 0.90% | 0.75% |
| MDMednax | 0.10% | 0.94% | 0.84% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FNDA and VAMO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNDA or VAMO?
FNDA has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VAMO charges 0.65%. FNDA is the cheaper option, by $40 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FNDA or VAMO?
Over the past year FNDA returned +19.62% vs +7.94% for VAMO, so FNDA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), FNDA annualized +9.68% vs +4.22% for VAMO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FNDA or VAMO?
FNDA has been the more volatile fund at 20.4% annualized versus 13.0% for VAMO. Worst drawdown: FNDA -45.9% vs VAMO -41.8%.
Should I hold both FNDA and VAMO?
FNDA and VAMO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FNDA and VAMO?
At least 4.5% of FNDA's money is in holdings VAMO also owns. Our book for VAMO is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 37 positions in common, counted across the 910 positions we hold weights for in FNDA and 102 in VAMO.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNDA or VAMO?
FNDA yields 1.21% while VAMO yields 0.65%, so FNDA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VAMO better than FNDA?
FNDA has a lower expense ratio. FNDA led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VAMO over 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.