FNGG vs HUSV
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF vs First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF
Quick Verdict
HUSV has a lower expense ratio. FNGG delivered stronger 1-year returns. HUSV offers more diversification with 101 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGG | HUSV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.70% | |
| AUM | $116M | $74M | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.05% | 1.37% | |
| Holdings | 18 | 101 | |
| YTD Return | +36.18% | +8.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.31% | +4.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +60.57% | +9.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.94% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 58.6% | 13.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -91.3% | -35.7% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2021 | Aug 24, 2016 |
FNGG vs HUSV Performance
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF (FNGG) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year FNGG returned +34.31% while HUSV returned +4.82%. Year to date, FNGG is up 36.18% versus a gain of 8.25% for HUSV.
Over three years, FNGG compounded at +60.57% per year against +9.75% for HUSV. Across the full 5-year window we track, HUSV has the edge at +8.47% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 58.6% compared with 13.2% for HUSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -91.3% for FNGG and -35.7% for HUSV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGG charges 0.97% per year while HUSV charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $70 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGG currently yields 11.05% against 1.37% for HUSV.
Holdings Overlap
FNGG and HUSV share 2 holdings out of 112 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGG or HUSV?
FNGG has an expense ratio of 0.97% while HUSV charges 0.70%. HUSV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FNGG or HUSV?
Over the past year FNGG returned +34.31% vs +4.82% for HUSV, so FNGG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FNGG annualized +4.86% vs +8.47% for HUSV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FNGG or HUSV?
FNGG has been the more volatile fund at 58.6% annualized versus 13.2% for HUSV. Worst drawdown: FNGG -91.3% vs HUSV -35.7%.
Should I hold both FNGG and HUSV?
FNGG and HUSV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FNGG and HUSV?
FNGG and HUSV share 2 common holdings with a 5.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 112 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGG or HUSV?
FNGG yields 11.05% while HUSV yields 1.37%, so FNGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.