FNGG vs PATN
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
Quick Verdict
PATN has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGG | PATN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $143M | $234M | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.70% | 1.67% | |
| Holdings | 18 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +29.44% | +30.11% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.54% | +51.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +60.38% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.76% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 58.4% | 21.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -91.3% | -16.8% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Pacer ETFs | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2021 | Sep 16, 2024 |
FNGG vs PATN Performance
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF (FNGG) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year FNGG returned +35.54% while PATN returned +51.30%. Year to date, FNGG is up 29.44% versus a gain of 30.11% for PATN.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 58.4% compared with 21.1% for PATN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -91.3% for FNGG and -16.8% for PATN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGG charges 0.97% per year while PATN charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $65 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGG currently yields 10.70% against 1.67% for PATN.
Holdings Overlap
FNGG and PATN share 0 holdings out of 114 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGG or PATN?
FNGG has an expense ratio of 0.97% while PATN charges 0.65%. PATN is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FNGG or PATN?
Over the past year FNGG returned +35.54% vs +51.30% for PATN, so PATN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FNGG annualized +3.76% vs +37.49% for PATN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FNGG or PATN?
FNGG has been the more volatile fund at 58.4% annualized versus 21.1% for PATN. Worst drawdown: FNGG -91.3% vs PATN -16.8%.
Should I hold both FNGG and PATN?
FNGG and PATN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FNGG and PATN?
FNGG and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 114 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGG or PATN?
FNGG yields 10.70% while PATN yields 1.67%, so FNGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.