FPFD vs VYM
Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FPFD | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $81M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.81% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 333 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | -3.04% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.09% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.71% | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.63% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 15, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FPFD vs VYM Performance
Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FPFD returned -1.09% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, FPFD is down 3.04% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Over three years, FPFD compounded at +5.71% per year against +19.03% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +0.63% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.10% annualized vs +0.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 8.4% for FPFD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.8% for FPFD and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FPFD charges 0.59% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $4 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FPFD currently yields 5.81% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FPFD and VYM share 26 holdings out of 656 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FPFD or VYM?
FPFD has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FPFD or VYM?
Over the past year FPFD returned -1.09% vs +24.22% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FPFD annualized +0.91% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FPFD or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 8.4% for FPFD. Worst drawdown: FPFD -20.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FPFD and VYM?
FPFD and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FPFD and VYM?
FPFD and VYM share 26 common holdings with a 5.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 656 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FPFD or VYM?
FPFD yields 5.81% while VYM yields 2.24%, so FPFD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.