FPFD vs VOO
Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FPFD | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $81M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.81% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 333 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -3.04% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.09% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.71% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.63% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.4% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 15, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FPFD vs VOO Performance
Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FPFD returned -1.09% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, FPFD is down 3.04% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, FPFD compounded at +5.71% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +0.63% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +0.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 8.4% for FPFD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.8% for FPFD and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FPFD charges 0.59% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FPFD currently yields 5.81% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FPFD and VOO share 24 holdings out of 560 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FPFD or VOO?
FPFD has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FPFD or VOO?
Over the past year FPFD returned -1.09% vs +21.79% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FPFD annualized +0.91% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FPFD or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 8.4% for FPFD. Worst drawdown: FPFD -20.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FPFD and VOO?
FPFD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FPFD and VOO?
FPFD and VOO share 24 common holdings with a 4.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 560 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FPFD or VOO?
FPFD yields 5.81% while VOO yields 1.08%, so FPFD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.