FPWR vs VOO
First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FPWR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $30M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.82% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 60 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.01% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.14% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.92% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.29% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 20, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FPWR vs VOO Performance
First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FPWR returned +15.14% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, FPWR is up 12.01% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, FPWR compounded at +17.92% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.29% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +11.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FPWR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.3% for FPWR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FPWR charges 0.96% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $3 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FPWR currently yields 1.82% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FPWR and VOO share 33 holdings out of 529 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FPWR or VOO?
FPWR has an expense ratio of 0.96% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $93 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FPWR or VOO?
Over the past year FPWR returned +15.14% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), FPWR annualized +11.02% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FPWR or VOO?
FPWR has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FPWR -32.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FPWR and VOO?
FPWR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FPWR and VOO?
FPWR and VOO share 33 common holdings with a 2.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 529 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FPWR or VOO?
FPWR yields 1.82% while VOO yields 1.09%, so FPWR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.