FPWR vs VYM
First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FPWR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $30M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.82% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 60 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +12.01% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.14% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.92% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.29% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 20, 2019 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FPWR vs VYM Performance
First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FPWR returned +15.14% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, FPWR is up 12.01% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, FPWR compounded at +17.92% per year against +18.43% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.29% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, FPWR has the edge at +11.02% annualized vs +7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 14.5% for FPWR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.3% for FPWR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FPWR charges 0.96% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $4 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FPWR currently yields 1.82% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FPWR and VYM share 39 holdings out of 576 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FPWR or VYM?
FPWR has an expense ratio of 0.96% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FPWR or VYM?
Over the past year FPWR returned +15.14% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), FPWR annualized +11.02% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FPWR or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 14.5% for FPWR. Worst drawdown: FPWR -32.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FPWR and VYM?
FPWR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FPWR and VYM?
FPWR and VYM share 39 common holdings with a 6.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 576 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FPWR or VYM?
FPWR yields 1.82% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.