FQAL vs INCE
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. INCE delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 130 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | INCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.29% | |
| AUM | $1.4B | $282M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.15% | 4.86% | |
| Holdings | 130 | 97 | |
| YTD Return | +12.56% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.37% | +23.49% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.54% | +17.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.62% | +10.71% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0% | 13.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.1% | -34.1% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2016 | Sep 20, 2016 |
FQAL vs INCE Performance
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year FQAL returned +19.37% while INCE returned +23.49%. Year to date, FQAL is up 12.56% versus a gain of 16.64% for INCE.
Over three years, FQAL compounded at +20.54% per year against +17.60% for INCE; over five years the annualized figures are +11.62% and +10.71% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, FQAL has the edge at +13.76% annualized vs +12.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FQAL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.0% compared with 13.8% for INCE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.1% for FQAL and -34.1% for INCE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FQAL charges 0.15% per year while INCE charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $29 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FQAL currently yields 1.15% against 4.86% for INCE.
Holdings Overlap
FQAL and INCE share 18 holdings out of 166 unique holdings combined, representing a 12.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FQAL or INCE?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while INCE charges 0.29%. FQAL is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $14 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FQAL or INCE?
Over the past year FQAL returned +19.37% vs +23.49% for INCE, so INCE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), FQAL annualized +13.76% vs +12.55% for INCE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FQAL or INCE?
FQAL has been the more volatile fund at 15.0% annualized versus 13.8% for INCE. Worst drawdown: FQAL -34.1% vs INCE -34.1%.
Should I hold both FQAL and INCE?
FQAL and INCE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FQAL and INCE?
FQAL and INCE share 18 common holdings with a 12.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 166 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FQAL or INCE?
FQAL yields 1.15% while INCE yields 4.86%, so INCE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.