FSPC vs IVV
First Trust Bloomberg Space Economy ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FSPC or IVV?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FSPC | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 103 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -3.41% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.88% |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.8% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 8, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FSPC vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FSPC vs IVV Performance
First Trust Bloomberg Space Economy ETF (FSPC) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, FSPC is down 3.41% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FSPC charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSPC currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
28.8% of FSPC's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.3% of IVV's money is in holdings FSPC also owns.
FSPC and IVV share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in FSPC and 505 in IVV, against full books of 103 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 490 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FSPC (98.0% of the fund), and 22 for FSPC that do not appear in IVV (33.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FSPC | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HONHoneywell International Inc. | 5.18% | 0.12% | 5.06% |
| NOCNorthrop Grumman Corp. | 4.75% | 0.11% | 4.64% |
| LHXL3Harris Technologies Inc. | 4.42% | 0.08% | 4.34% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 3.83% | 0.55% | 3.28% |
| SATS'echostar Communications Corp. Class 'a'' | 4.04% | 0.02% | 4.02% |
| BABoeing Co | 3.30% | 0.28% | 3.02% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 3.30% | 0.18% | 3.12% |
28.8% of FSPC is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FSPC or IVV?
FSPC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FSPC and IVV?
28.8% of FSPC's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.3% of IVV's is in holdings FSPC also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in FSPC and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FSPC or IVV?
FSPC yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FSPC?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.