FSPC vs VXUS

FSPC vs VXUS

Which is better, FSPC or VXUS?

VXUS costs less.

VXUS has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: VXUS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFSPCVXUS
Expense Ratio0.65%0.05%Best
AUM$2M$158.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.51%
Holdings1038,747
YTD Return-2.64%+13.44%Best
1Y Return-+21.98%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.89%
5Y Return (annualized)-+9.16%
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 8, 2026Jan 26, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

FSPC vs VXUS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

FSPC vs VXUS Performance

First Trust Bloomberg Space Economy ETF (FSPC) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, FSPC is down 2.64% versus a gain of 13.44% for VXUS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FSPC charges 0.65% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $5 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSPC currently yields 0.00% against 2.51% for VXUS.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 48 holdings in FSPC and 8,082 in VXUS, totalling 93.4% and 88.8% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 9 positions appear in both.

9 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in FSPC and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 103 and 8,747.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FSPCWeight in VXUSDifference
7011:JPMitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. Com Stk5.11%0.17%4.94%
SAF:PASafran4.69%0.30%4.39%
RHMG:SGRheinmetall Ag3.39%0.14%3.25%
IDR:MAIndra Sistemas Sa3.05%0.01%3.04%
MDA:CAMda Space Ltdnonenone2.08%0.01%2.07%
STEG:SISingapore Tech Engineerin1.35%0.03%1.32%
HUBN:SMHuber & Suhner Ag0.93%0.01%0.92%
9412:JPSky Perfect Jsat Corp0.41%0.00%0.41%
GILTGilat Satellite Networks Ltd0.38%0.00%0.38%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FSPC and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FSPCVXUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FSPC or VXUS?

FSPC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which pays a higher dividend, FSPC or VXUS?

FSPC yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VXUS better than FSPC?

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.