FSPC vs VTI
First Trust Bloomberg Space Economy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FSPC or VTI?
VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FSPC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 103 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -6.31% | +11.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.05% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.32% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.50% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 8, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
FSPC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FSPC vs VTI Performance
First Trust Bloomberg Space Economy ETF (FSPC) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, FSPC is down 6.31% versus a gain of 11.95% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FSPC charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSPC currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.3% of VTI's money is in holdings FSPC also owns.
Stated as a floor: for FSPC, our book for it covers 93.4% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and FSPC share little of their money.
25 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in FSPC and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 103 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FSPC | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 4.72% | 0.37% | 4.35% |
| NOCNorthrop Grumman Corp. | 4.82% | 0.11% | 4.71% |
| LHXL3Harris Technologies Inc. | 4.31% | 0.07% | 4.24% |
| SATS'echostar Communications Corp. Class 'a'' | 4.18% | 0.02% | 4.16% |
| VSATViasat Inc | 3.97% | 0.01% | 3.96% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 3.36% | 0.19% | 3.17% |
| ASTSAst Spacemobile Inc Class A | 3.40% | 0.02% | 3.38% |
| BABoeing Co | 2.99% | 0.24% | 2.75% |
| RKLBRocket Lab Corp | 3.12% | 0.05% | 3.07% |
| HONHoneywell International Inc. | 3.03% | 0.11% | 2.92% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FSPC and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FSPC or VTI?
FSPC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FSPC and VTI?
At least 1.3% of VTI's money is in holdings FSPC also owns. Our book for FSPC is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 25 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in FSPC and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FSPC or VTI?
FSPC yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FSPC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.