FSPC vs QQQ
First Trust Bloomberg Space Economy ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, FSPC or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. FSPC is less concentrated, with 43.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FSPC | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $486.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 103 | 107 |
| YTD Return | -3.41% | +17.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +25.59% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.18% |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.8%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 8, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FSPC vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FSPC vs QQQ Performance
First Trust Bloomberg Space Economy ETF (FSPC) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, FSPC is down 3.41% versus a gain of 17.54% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FSPC charges 0.65% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $18 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSPC currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
15.6% of FSPC's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 3.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings FSPC also owns.
FSPC and QQQ share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in FSPC and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 103 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 92 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for FSPC (94.5% of the fund), and 25 for FSPC that do not appear in QQQ (47.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FSPC and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FSPC or QQQ?
FSPC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FSPC and QQQ?
15.6% of FSPC's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 3.0% of QQQ's is in holdings FSPC also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in FSPC and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, FSPC or QQQ?
FSPC yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than FSPC?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. FSPC is less concentrated, with 43.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.