FTIF vs IVV
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FTIF delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTIF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +28.74% | +13.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +40.38% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.52% | +22.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 13, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
FTIF vs IVV Performance
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FTIF returned +40.38% while IVV returned +21.62%. Year to date, FTIF is up 28.74% versus a gain of 13.22% for IVV.
Over three years, FTIF compounded at +13.52% per year against +22.17% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, FTIF has the edge at +14.66% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTIF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.8% for FTIF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTIF charges 0.60% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTIF currently yields 1.08% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FTIF and IVV share 32 holdings out of 523 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTIF or IVV?
FTIF has an expense ratio of 0.60% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTIF or IVV?
Over the past year FTIF returned +40.38% vs +21.62% for IVV, so FTIF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FTIF annualized +14.66% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTIF or IVV?
FTIF has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FTIF -27.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FTIF and IVV?
FTIF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTIF and IVV?
FTIF and IVV share 32 common holdings with a 4.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 523 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTIF or IVV?
FTIF yields 1.08% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.