FTIF vs IVV
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FTIF or IVV?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FTIF led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. FTIF is less concentrated, with 23.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTIF | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $6M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 102 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +27.57%Best | +12.51% |
| 1Y Return | +33.49%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.48% | +21.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 12.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.8% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.5 years | $15,857 | $20,480Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.7%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 13, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 14, 2023 to Sep 11, 2026 (3.5 years).
FTIF vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.
FTIF vs IVV Performance
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FTIF returned +33.49% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, FTIF is up 27.57% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Over three years, FTIF compounded at +12.48% per year against +21.27% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +22.73% annualized vs +14.08%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTIF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 12.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.8% for FTIF and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTIF charges 0.60% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTIF currently yields 1.03% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
63.1% of FTIF's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 4.5% of IVV's money is in holdings FTIF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
32 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTIF and 505 in IVV, against full books of 102 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 464 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FTIF (94.8% of the fund), and 18 for FTIF that do not appear in IVV (36.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FTIF | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 2.09% | 0.94% | 1.15% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 2.20% | 0.52% | 1.68% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp. | 2.59% | 0.13% | 2.46% |
| VLOValero Energy Corp. | 2.44% | 0.13% | 2.31% |
| NEMNewmont Corp. | 2.39% | 0.17% | 2.22% |
| COPConocophillips Co | 2.26% | 0.21% | 2.05% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 2.26% | 0.16% | 2.10% |
| RTXRaytheon Technologies Corp | 1.94% | 0.45% | 1.49% |
| APAApa Corp | 2.35% | 0.02% | 2.33% |
| OXYOccidental Petroleum Corp. | 2.20% | 0.06% | 2.14% |
63.1% of FTIF is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTIF or IVV?
FTIF has an expense ratio of 0.60% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FTIF or IVV?
Over the past year FTIF returned +33.49% vs +17.57% for IVV, so FTIF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FTIF annualized +14.08% vs +22.73% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FTIF or IVV?
FTIF has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 12.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FTIF -27.8% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both FTIF and IVV?
FTIF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FTIF and IVV?
63.1% of FTIF's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 4.5% of IVV's is in holdings FTIF also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTIF and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTIF or IVV?
FTIF yields 1.03% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FTIF?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FTIF led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. FTIF is less concentrated, with 23.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.