FTXO vs IVV
First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FTXO delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTXO | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $321M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.72% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +9.72% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.25% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.38% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.89% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -57.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
FTXO vs IVV Performance
First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FTXO returned +24.25% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, FTXO is up 9.72% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, FTXO compounded at +27.38% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.89% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, FTXO has the edge at +8.89% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTXO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.8% for FTXO and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTXO charges 0.60% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTXO currently yields 1.72% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FTXO and IVV share 13 holdings out of 542 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTXO or IVV?
FTXO has an expense ratio of 0.60% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTXO or IVV?
Over the past year FTXO returned +24.25% vs +20.94% for IVV, so FTXO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), FTXO annualized +8.89% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTXO or IVV?
FTXO has been the more volatile fund at 27.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FTXO -57.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FTXO and IVV?
FTXO and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTXO and IVV?
FTXO and IVV share 13 common holdings with a 3.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 542 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTXO or IVV?
FTXO yields 1.72% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FTXO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.