FUND vs VTI
Sprott Focus Trust vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FUND or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
FUND led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FUND | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.03% |
| AUM | $334M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.01% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 31 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +15.52%Best | +12.51% |
| 1Y Return | +23.28%Best | +15.23% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.83% | +22.50%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.59% | +12.31%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.4% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -71.6% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,542 | $17,869Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.3% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 1, 1996 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Oct 1, 2026 (25.3 years).
FUND vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.3 years both funds cover.
FUND vs VTI Performance
Sprott Focus Trust (FUND) is an ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FUND returned +23.28% while VTI returned +15.23%. Year to date, FUND is up 15.52% versus a gain of 12.51% for VTI.
Over three years, FUND compounded at +16.83% per year against +22.50% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.59% and +12.31% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.03% annualized vs +3.54%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FUND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -71.6% for FUND and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Holdings Overlap
60.8% of FUND's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.2% of VTI's money is in holdings FUND also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in FUND and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 31 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,138 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FUND (96.2% of the fund), and 3 for FUND that do not appear in VTI (13.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FUND | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 4.38% | 0.89% | 3.49% |
| CALMCal-maine Foods Inc | 4.78% | 0.01% | 4.77% |
| RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 4.67% | 0.03% | 4.64% |
| NUENucor Corp. | 4.50% | 0.08% | 4.42% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 4.51% | 0.03% | 4.48% |
| FHIFederated Investors Inc. | 4.43% | 0.01% | 4.42% |
| STLDSteel Dynamics, Inc. | 4.34% | 0.05% | 4.29% |
| HPHelmerich & Payne, Inc. | 4.15% | 0.00% | 4.15% |
| WLKWestlake Chemical Corp. | 3.74% | 0.00% | 3.74% |
| HRBH&R Block, Inc. | 3.48% | 0.01% | 3.47% |
60.8% of FUND is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, FUND or VTI?
Over the past year FUND returned +23.28% vs +15.23% for VTI, so FUND leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), FUND annualized +3.54% vs +8.03% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FUND or VTI?
FUND has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FUND -71.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FUND and VTI?
FUND and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FUND and VTI?
60.8% of FUND's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.2% of VTI's is in holdings FUND also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in FUND and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FUND or VTI?
FUND yields 5.01% while VTI yields 1.03%, so FUND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FUND?
FUND led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.