GFGF vs SCHD
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GFGF | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $36M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.21% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +4.16% | +25.62% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.43% | +32.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.46% | +15.58% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.63% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.0% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | GuruFocus Investments, LLC | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2021 | Oct 20, 2011 |
GFGF vs SCHD Performance
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) is a ETF from GuruFocus Investments, LLC and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year GFGF returned +12.43% while SCHD returned +32.62%. Year to date, GFGF is up 4.16% versus a gain of 25.62% for SCHD.
Over three years, GFGF compounded at +17.46% per year against +15.58% for SCHD. Across the full 5-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.47% annualized vs +9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GFGF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.0% for GFGF and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GFGF charges 0.66% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $6 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GFGF currently yields 0.21% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GFGF or SCHD?
GFGF has an expense ratio of 0.66% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $60 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GFGF or SCHD?
Over the past year GFGF returned +12.43% vs +32.62% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GFGF annualized +9.00% vs +11.47% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GFGF or SCHD?
GFGF has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: GFGF -28.0% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both GFGF and SCHD?
GFGF and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GFGF and SCHD?
GFGF and SCHD share 2 common holdings with a 7.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 128 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GFGF or SCHD?
GFGF yields 0.21% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.