GFGF vs VXUS
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GFGF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $36M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.21% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +4.41% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.46% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.54% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | GuruFocus Investments, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
GFGF vs VXUS Performance
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) is a ETF from GuruFocus Investments, LLC and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GFGF returned +13.46% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, GFGF is up 4.41% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, GFGF compounded at +17.54% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 5-year window we track, GFGF has the edge at +9.08% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GFGF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.0% for GFGF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GFGF charges 0.66% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $5 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GFGF currently yields 0.21% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
GFGF and VXUS share 2 holdings out of 7889 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GFGF or VXUS?
GFGF has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GFGF or VXUS?
Over the past year GFGF returned +13.46% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GFGF annualized +9.08% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GFGF or VXUS?
GFGF has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: GFGF -28.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both GFGF and VXUS?
GFGF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GFGF and VXUS?
GFGF and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 1.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7889 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GFGF or VXUS?
GFGF yields 0.21% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.