GFGF vs QQQ
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, GFGF or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GFGF | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $33M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.20% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 29 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +2.38% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.63% | +21.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.14% | +25.63%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.24% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.2%Best | 21.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -28.0%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $14,728 | $19,315Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 50.1% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | GuruFocus Investments, LLC | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 16, 2021 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.8 years).
GFGF vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
GFGF vs QQQ Performance
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) is an ETF from GuruFocus Investments, LLC and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GFGF returned +7.63% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, GFGF is up 2.38% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Over three years, GFGF compounded at +17.14% per year against +25.63% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.2% compared with 17.2% for GFGF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.0% for GFGF and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GFGF charges 0.66% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $18 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GFGF currently yields 0.20% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
42.2% of GFGF's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 37.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings GFGF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in GFGF and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 29 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 85 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for GFGF (60.8% of the fund), and 17 for GFGF that do not appear in QQQ (53.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GFGF | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.74% | 5.76% | 2.98% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.48% | 8.44% | 3.96% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.30% | 7.27% | 2.97% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.79% | 3.36% | 1.43% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.38% | 4.67% | 1.29% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.10% | 3.13% | 1.03% |
| ASL:ASAsml Holding Nv Unsponsored Adr Ordinary Shares | 4.13% | 0.68% | 3.45% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.95% | 2.78% | 0.83% |
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 2.67% | 0.29% | 2.38% |
| SNPSSynopsys | 2.36% | 0.34% | 2.02% |
42.2% of GFGF is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GFGF or QQQ?
GFGF has an expense ratio of 0.66% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $48 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GFGF or QQQ?
Over the past year GFGF returned +7.63% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GFGF or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 21.2% annualized versus 17.2% for GFGF. Worst drawdown: GFGF -28.0% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both GFGF and QQQ?
GFGF and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GFGF and QQQ?
42.2% of GFGF's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 37.4% of QQQ's is in holdings GFGF also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in GFGF and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, GFGF or QQQ?
GFGF yields 0.20% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than GFGF?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.