GFGF vs VYM
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GFGF | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $36M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.21% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +4.16% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.43% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.46% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | GuruFocus Investments, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GFGF vs VYM Performance
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) is a ETF from GuruFocus Investments, LLC and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GFGF returned +12.43% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, GFGF is up 4.16% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, GFGF compounded at +17.46% per year against +18.43% for VYM. Across the full 5-year window we track, GFGF has the edge at +9.00% annualized vs +7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GFGF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.0% for GFGF and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GFGF charges 0.66% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $4 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GFGF currently yields 0.21% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GFGF and VYM share 4 holdings out of 584 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GFGF or VYM?
GFGF has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GFGF or VYM?
Over the past year GFGF returned +12.43% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GFGF annualized +9.00% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GFGF or VYM?
GFGF has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GFGF -28.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GFGF and VYM?
GFGF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GFGF and VYM?
GFGF and VYM share 4 common holdings with a 3.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 584 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GFGF or VYM?
GFGF yields 0.21% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.