GFGF vs VTI
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GFGF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $33M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.21% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 29 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +3.38% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.97% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.15% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GuruFocus Investments, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
GFGF vs VTI Performance
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) is a ETF from GuruFocus Investments, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GFGF returned +10.97% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, GFGF is up 3.38% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, GFGF compounded at +18.15% per year against +21.54% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, GFGF has the edge at +8.78% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GFGF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.0% for GFGF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GFGF charges 0.66% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GFGF currently yields 0.21% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GFGF and VTI share 25 holdings out of 2792 unique holdings combined, representing a 28.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GFGF or VTI?
GFGF has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GFGF or VTI?
Over the past year GFGF returned +10.97% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GFGF annualized +8.78% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GFGF or VTI?
GFGF has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GFGF -28.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GFGF and VTI?
GFGF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between GFGF and VTI?
GFGF and VTI share 25 common holdings with a 28.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2792 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GFGF or VTI?
GFGF yields 0.21% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.