GFGF vs VTI
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GFGF or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GFGF | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $33M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.20% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 29 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +2.38% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.63% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.14% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.2% | 16.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -28.0% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $14,728 | $17,059Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 50.1% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | GuruFocus Investments, LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 16, 2021 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.8 years).
GFGF vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
GFGF vs VTI Performance
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) is an ETF from GuruFocus Investments, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GFGF returned +7.63% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, GFGF is up 2.38% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, GFGF compounded at +17.14% per year against +21.01% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GFGF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.2% compared with 16.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.0% for GFGF and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GFGF charges 0.66% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GFGF currently yields 0.20% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
82.5% of GFGF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 34.5% of VTI's money is in holdings GFGF also owns.
Most of GFGF is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
26 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in GFGF and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 29 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,124 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for GFGF (63.0% of the fund), and 2 for GFGF that do not appear in VTI (9.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GFGF | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.74% | 4.79% | 3.95% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.48% | 6.40% | 1.92% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.30% | 6.29% | 1.99% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.79% | 2.90% | 1.89% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.38% | 3.65% | 0.27% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.98% | 1.35% | 2.63% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 3.85% | 1.28% | 2.57% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.15% | 0.83% | 3.32% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group, Inc. | 4.08% | 0.52% | 3.56% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.10% | 2.31% | 0.21% |
82.5% of GFGF is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GFGF or VTI?
GFGF has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $63 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GFGF or VTI?
Over the past year GFGF returned +7.63% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GFGF or VTI?
GFGF has been the more volatile fund at 17.2% annualized versus 16.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GFGF -28.0% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both GFGF and VTI?
GFGF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GFGF and VTI?
82.5% of GFGF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 34.5% of VTI's is in holdings GFGF also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in GFGF and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GFGF or VTI?
GFGF yields 0.20% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GFGF?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.