GKAT vs VTI
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GKAT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $169M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.65% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 36 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +11.88% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.00% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Scharf Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
GKAT vs VTI Performance
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT) is a ETF from Scharf Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GKAT returned +19.00% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, GKAT is up 11.88% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.4% for GKAT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.4% for GKAT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GKAT charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GKAT currently yields 0.65% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GKAT and VTI share 21 holdings out of 2798 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GKAT or VTI?
GKAT has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GKAT or VTI?
Over the past year GKAT returned +19.00% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GKAT or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.4% for GKAT. Worst drawdown: GKAT -10.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GKAT and VTI?
GKAT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GKAT and VTI?
GKAT and VTI share 21 common holdings with a 13.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2798 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GKAT or VTI?
GKAT yields 0.65% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.