GLOW vs IGBH
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF vs iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
IGBH has a lower expense ratio. GLOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. IGBH offers more diversification with 4,130 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLOW | IGBH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.14% | |
| AUM | $68M | $233M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | 5.62% | |
| Holdings | 16 | 4,130 | |
| YTD Return | +13.69% | +2.05% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.11% | +5.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.69% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.6% | 7.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.6% | -38.9% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2024 | Jul 22, 2015 |
GLOW vs IGBH Performance
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GLOW returned +23.11% while IGBH returned +5.62%. Year to date, GLOW is up 13.69% versus a gain of 2.05% for IGBH.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLOW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.6% compared with 7.5% for IGBH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.6% for GLOW and -38.9% for IGBH. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLOW charges 0.72% per year while IGBH charges 0.14%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $14 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLOW currently yields 1.41% against 5.62% for IGBH.
Holdings Overlap
GLOW and IGBH share 0 holdings out of 90 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLOW or IGBH?
GLOW has an expense ratio of 0.72% while IGBH charges 0.14%. IGBH is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $58 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLOW or IGBH?
Over the past year GLOW returned +23.11% vs +5.62% for IGBH, so GLOW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GLOW annualized +19.11% vs +2.90% for IGBH. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLOW or IGBH?
GLOW has been the more volatile fund at 10.6% annualized versus 7.5% for IGBH. Worst drawdown: GLOW -15.6% vs IGBH -38.9%.
Should I hold both GLOW and IGBH?
GLOW and IGBH have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GLOW and IGBH?
GLOW and IGBH share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 90 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLOW or IGBH?
GLOW yields 1.41% while IGBH yields 5.62%, so IGBH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.