GLOW vs TLTP
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF vs Amplify TLT US Treasury 12% Option Income ETF
Quick Verdict
TLTP has a lower expense ratio. GLOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. GLOW offers more diversification with 16 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLOW | TLTP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.39% | |
| AUM | $68M | $25M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | 15.05% | |
| Holdings | 16 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | -8.91% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.54% | -6.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.7% | 8.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.6% | -13.3% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Amplify ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2024 | Oct 29, 2024 |
GLOW vs TLTP Performance
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Amplify TLT US Treasury 12% Option Income ETF (TLTP) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs. Over the past year GLOW returned +24.54% while TLTP returned -6.89%. Year to date, GLOW is up 14.50% versus a loss of 8.91% for TLTP.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLOW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.7% compared with 8.7% for TLTP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.6% for GLOW and -13.3% for TLTP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLOW charges 0.72% per year while TLTP charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $39 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLOW currently yields 1.41% against 15.05% for TLTP.
Holdings Overlap
GLOW and TLTP share 0 holdings out of 17 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLOW or TLTP?
GLOW has an expense ratio of 0.72% while TLTP charges 0.39%. TLTP is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $33 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLOW or TLTP?
Over the past year GLOW returned +24.54% vs -6.89% for TLTP, so GLOW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GLOW annualized +19.48% vs -5.03% for TLTP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLOW or TLTP?
GLOW has been the more volatile fund at 10.7% annualized versus 8.7% for TLTP. Worst drawdown: GLOW -15.6% vs TLTP -13.3%.
Should I hold both GLOW and TLTP?
GLOW and TLTP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GLOW and TLTP?
GLOW and TLTP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 17 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLOW or TLTP?
GLOW yields 1.41% while TLTP yields 15.05%, so TLTP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.