GPT vs VYM
Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GPT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $23M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.67% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 88 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +13.51% | +16.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.51% | +25.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Intelligent Alpha | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GPT vs VYM Performance
Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF (GPT) is a ETF from Intelligent Alpha and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GPT returned +24.51% while VYM returned +25.03%. Year to date, GPT is up 13.51% versus a gain of 16.53% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.5% for GPT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.6% for GPT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GPT charges 0.69% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $4 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GPT currently yields 0.67% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GPT and VYM share 1 holdings out of 566 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GPT | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CB | 0.98% | 0.55% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GPT or VYM?
GPT has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GPT or VYM?
Over the past year GPT returned +24.51% vs +25.03% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GPT annualized +19.23% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GPT or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.5% for GPT. Worst drawdown: GPT -25.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GPT and VYM?
GPT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GPT and VYM?
GPT and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 566 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GPT or VYM?
GPT yields 0.67% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.