GPT vs IVV
Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GPT delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GPT | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $23M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.67% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 88 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +13.46% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.42% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Intelligent Alpha | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
GPT vs IVV Performance
Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF (GPT) is a ETF from Intelligent Alpha and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GPT returned +24.42% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, GPT is up 13.46% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.5% for GPT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.6% for GPT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GPT charges 0.69% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GPT currently yields 0.67% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GPT or IVV?
GPT has an expense ratio of 0.69% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GPT or IVV?
Over the past year GPT returned +24.42% vs +22.02% for IVV, so GPT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GPT annualized +19.18% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GPT or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.5% for GPT. Worst drawdown: GPT -25.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GPT and IVV?
GPT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GPT and IVV?
GPT and IVV share 2 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 512 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GPT or IVV?
GPT yields 0.67% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.