GRIN vs VTI
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GRIN delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRIN | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $339M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +20.59% | +13.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.49% | +21.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
GRIN vs VTI Performance
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GRIN) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GRIN returned +28.49% while VTI returned +21.12%. Year to date, GRIN is up 20.59% versus a gain of 13.38% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GRIN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.3% for GRIN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRIN charges 0.56% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRIN currently yields 0.53% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GRIN and VTI share 2 holdings out of 2885 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRIN or VTI?
GRIN has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $53 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GRIN or VTI?
Over the past year GRIN returned +28.49% vs +21.12% for VTI, so GRIN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GRIN annualized +28.10% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GRIN or VTI?
GRIN has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GRIN -14.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GRIN and VTI?
GRIN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GRIN and VTI?
GRIN and VTI share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2885 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRIN or VTI?
GRIN yields 0.53% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.