GRIN vs IVV
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GRIN or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GRIN led over 1Y and the full window. GRIN is less concentrated, with 24.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRIN | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $358M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 102 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +18.15%Best | +13.32% |
| 1Y Return | +21.05%Best | +17.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.72% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.20% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.3% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $12,891Best | $12,625 |
| Top 10 Weight | 24.9%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2025 to Sep 23, 2026 (1.2 years).
GRIN vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
GRIN vs IVV Performance
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GRIN) is an ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GRIN returned +21.05% while IVV returned +17.08%. Year to date, GRIN is up 18.15% versus a gain of 13.32% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GRIN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 11.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.3% for GRIN and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRIN charges 0.56% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRIN currently yields 0.53% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
1.7% of GRIN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings GRIN also owns.
GRIN and IVV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in GRIN and 490 in IVV, against full books of 102 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 481 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GRIN (98.5% of the fund), and 1 for GRIN that do not appear in IVV (1.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GRIN | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICEIntercontinental Hotels Group Plc | 1.66% | 0.14% | 1.52% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GRIN and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRIN or IVV?
GRIN has an expense ratio of 0.56% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GRIN or IVV?
Over the past year GRIN returned +21.05% vs +17.08% for IVV, so GRIN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GRIN annualized +23.57% vs +21.44% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GRIN or IVV?
GRIN has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 11.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GRIN -14.3% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both GRIN and IVV?
GRIN and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GRIN and IVV?
1.7% of GRIN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.1% of IVV's is in holdings GRIN also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in GRIN and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRIN or IVV?
GRIN yields 0.53% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GRIN?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GRIN led over 1Y and the full window. GRIN is less concentrated, with 24.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.