GRIN vs VXUS
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. GRIN delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRIN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $274M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.23% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 105 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +20.66% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.99% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
GRIN vs VXUS Performance
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GRIN) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GRIN returned +31.99% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, GRIN is up 20.66% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GRIN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.3% for GRIN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRIN charges 0.56% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $5 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRIN currently yields 0.23% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
GRIN and VXUS share 72 holdings out of 7890 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRIN or VXUS?
GRIN has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GRIN or VXUS?
Over the past year GRIN returned +31.99% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so GRIN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GRIN annualized +28.72% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GRIN or VXUS?
GRIN has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: GRIN -14.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both GRIN and VXUS?
GRIN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GRIN and VXUS?
GRIN and VXUS share 72 common holdings with a 6.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7890 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRIN or VXUS?
GRIN yields 0.23% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.