GRIN vs VYM
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GRIN delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRIN | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $274M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.23% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 105 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +20.66% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.99% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GRIN vs VYM Performance
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GRIN) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GRIN returned +31.99% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, GRIN is up 20.66% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GRIN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.3% for GRIN and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRIN charges 0.56% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $4 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRIN currently yields 0.23% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GRIN and VYM share 0 holdings out of 659 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRIN or VYM?
GRIN has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GRIN or VYM?
Over the past year GRIN returned +31.99% vs +26.05% for VYM, so GRIN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GRIN annualized +28.72% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GRIN or VYM?
GRIN has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GRIN -14.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GRIN and VYM?
GRIN and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GRIN and VYM?
GRIN and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 659 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRIN or VYM?
GRIN yields 0.23% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.