GSSC vs SCHD
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, GSSC or SCHD?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. GSSC led over 3Y, SCHD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. GSSC is less concentrated, with 4.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GSSC | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.05% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 1,422 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +15.17% | +21.73%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.76% | +26.35%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.59%Best | +16.02% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.17% | +9.26%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 15.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -42.5% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,137 | $15,571Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 4.6%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 28, 2017 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 29, 2017 to Sep 25, 2026 (9.2 years).
GSSC vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.2 years both funds cover.
GSSC vs SCHD Performance
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year GSSC returned +17.76% while SCHD returned +26.35%. Year to date, GSSC is up 15.17% versus a gain of 21.73% for SCHD.
Over three years, GSSC compounded at +17.59% per year against +16.02% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +7.17% and +9.26% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.29% annualized vs +9.45%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GSSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 15.9% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.5% for GSSC and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GSSC charges 0.20% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $6 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSSC currently yields 1.05% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
2.2% of GSSC's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 1.4% of SCHD's money is in holdings GSSC also owns.
GSSC and SCHD share little of their money.
32 positions in common, counted across the 1,411 positions we hold weights for in GSSC and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 1,422 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 68 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for GSSC (98.5% of the fund), and 1,313 for GSSC that do not appear in SCHD (92.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GSSC | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCMoelis & Co_None_0 | 0.19% | 0.12% | 0.07% |
| APAMArtisan Partners Asset Management, Inc. | 0.19% | 0.07% | 0.12% |
| MURMurphy Oil Corp | 0.10% | 0.12% | 0.02% |
| IPARInter Parfums Inc | 0.15% | 0.05% | 0.10% |
| KFYKorn Ferry | 0.09% | 0.11% | 0.02% |
| CNSCohen & Steers Inc | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.07% |
| CVBFCvb Financial Corp. | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.02% |
| AGMFederal Agricultural Mortgage Corp | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
| OFG:PROfg Bancorp Common Stock | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
| BKEBuckle Inc/the | 0.10% | 0.03% | 0.07% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GSSC and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GSSC or SCHD?
GSSC has an expense ratio of 0.20% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GSSC or SCHD?
Over the past year GSSC returned +17.76% vs +26.35% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), GSSC annualized +9.45% vs +11.29% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GSSC or SCHD?
GSSC has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 15.9% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: GSSC -42.5% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both GSSC and SCHD?
GSSC and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GSSC and SCHD?
2.2% of GSSC's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 1.4% of SCHD's is in holdings GSSC also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 1,411 positions we hold weights for in GSSC and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, GSSC or SCHD?
GSSC yields 1.05% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than GSSC?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. GSSC led over 3Y, SCHD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. GSSC is less concentrated, with 4.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.