HACK vs QQQ
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. HACK delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HACK | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $3.1B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 25 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +49.05% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +43.48% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +32.86% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.10% | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 11, 2014 | Mar 10, 1999 |
HACK vs QQQ Performance
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year HACK returned +43.48% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, HACK is up 49.05% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, HACK compounded at +32.86% per year against +26.64% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +14.10% and +15.36% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, HACK has the edge at +14.57% annualized vs +13.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 20.8% for HACK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.7% for HACK and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HACK charges 0.60% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $18 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HACK currently yields 0.06% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
HACK and QQQ share 5 holdings out of 121 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HACK or QQQ?
HACK has an expense ratio of 0.60% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HACK or QQQ?
Over the past year HACK returned +43.48% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so HACK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), HACK annualized +14.57% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HACK or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 20.8% for HACK. Worst drawdown: HACK -42.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both HACK and QQQ?
HACK and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HACK and QQQ?
HACK and QQQ share 5 common holdings with a 8.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 121 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HACK or QQQ?
HACK yields 0.06% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.