HACK vs VOO
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. HACK delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HACK | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.1B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 25 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +49.05% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +43.48% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +32.86% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.10% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.8% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 11, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
HACK vs VOO Performance
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HACK returned +43.48% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, HACK is up 49.05% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, HACK compounded at +32.86% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +14.10% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, HACK has the edge at +14.57% annualized vs +13.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HACK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.8% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.7% for HACK and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HACK charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HACK currently yields 0.06% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
HACK and VOO share 9 holdings out of 520 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HACK or VOO?
HACK has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HACK or VOO?
Over the past year HACK returned +43.48% vs +21.79% for VOO, so HACK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), HACK annualized +14.57% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HACK or VOO?
HACK has been the more volatile fund at 20.8% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: HACK -42.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both HACK and VOO?
HACK and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HACK and VOO?
HACK and VOO share 9 common holdings with a 4.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 520 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HACK or VOO?
HACK yields 0.06% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.