HACK vs VTI
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, HACK or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. HACK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HACK | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.9B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.05% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 25 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +54.09%Best | +13.10% |
| 1Y Return | +41.53%Best | +17.01% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +33.82%Best | +22.26% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.96%Best | +11.98% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.7% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -42.7% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,220Best | $17,608 |
| Top 10 Weight | 53.1% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 11, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 12, 2014 to Sep 24, 2026 (11.9 years).
HACK vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.9 years both funds cover.
HACK vs VTI Performance
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HACK returned +41.53% while VTI returned +17.01%. Year to date, HACK is up 54.09% versus a gain of 13.10% for VTI.
Over three years, HACK compounded at +33.82% per year against +22.26% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.96% and +11.98% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, HACK has the edge at +14.74% annualized vs +12.11%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HACK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.7% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.7% for HACK and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HACK charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HACK currently yields 0.05% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
90.7% of HACK's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 4.4% of VTI's money is in holdings HACK also owns.
Most of HACK is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
20 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in HACK and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 25 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,133 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for HACK (93.0% of the fund), and 2 for HACK that do not appear in VTI (2.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HACK | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.29% | 2.56% | 2.73% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 6.62% | 0.38% | 6.24% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 6.02% | 0.26% | 5.76% |
| NETCloudflare Inc (180 Day Lockup) | 5.41% | 0.12% | 5.29% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 5.35% | 0.14% | 5.21% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 4.89% | 0.57% | 4.32% |
| OKTAOkta Inc. | 5.05% | 0.03% | 5.02% |
| QLYSQualys Inc | 5.03% | 0.01% | 5.02% |
| ZSZscaler, Inc | 4.82% | 0.02% | 4.80% |
| GDGeneral Dynamics Corp. | 4.64% | 0.14% | 4.50% |
90.7% of HACK is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HACK or VTI?
HACK has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HACK or VTI?
Over the past year HACK returned +41.53% vs +17.01% for VTI, so HACK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), HACK annualized +14.74% vs +12.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HACK or VTI?
HACK has been the more volatile fund at 20.7% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: HACK -42.7% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both HACK and VTI?
HACK and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HACK and VTI?
90.7% of HACK's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 4.4% of VTI's is in holdings HACK also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in HACK and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, HACK or VTI?
HACK yields 0.05% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than HACK?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. HACK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.