HACK vs VTI
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. HACK delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HACK | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.1B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 25 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +49.05% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +43.48% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +32.86% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.10% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.8% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 11, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
HACK vs VTI Performance
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HACK returned +43.48% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, HACK is up 49.05% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, HACK compounded at +32.86% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +14.10% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, HACK has the edge at +14.57% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HACK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.8% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.7% for HACK and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HACK charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HACK currently yields 0.06% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
HACK and VTI share 20 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HACK or VTI?
HACK has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HACK or VTI?
Over the past year HACK returned +43.48% vs +22.43% for VTI, so HACK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), HACK annualized +14.57% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HACK or VTI?
HACK has been the more volatile fund at 20.8% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: HACK -42.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both HACK and VTI?
HACK and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HACK and VTI?
HACK and VTI share 20 common holdings with a 4.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HACK or VTI?
HACK yields 0.06% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.